Upto few years ago, In some dusty trunk of my house lied a heap of comics that I have read and re-read hundreds of times.
I read them when I was bored or because I didn't want to study and was surely a source of entertainment.
Comics were a quick getaway, as We lived those characters.
I speak for most of us 80s and 90s kids, when not even a day went without reading our favourite comics.
One of the most favourite one was Panchatantra - interesting short stories which ended with a moral.
Another favourite one Chandamama - It became an alternate to our grandparent's stories. Those bed-time stories often had a moral for us at the end of the story.
We were groomed and fed with loads of Morals since childhood. Our parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, the books we read, everything and everyone were feeding us with morals, with good intentions to give us good upbringing and values.
They don't make those books these days, neither do we have Morals left these days.
What is Morality after all?As we all understand, it's a set of intentions, actions, standards, principles, code of conduct derived from / for a specific geography, region, philosophy and culture, for the sole purpose to enable people live in cooperation and harmony.
Morality are a bunch of unwritten rules to define the goodness in a society.
Moral or Ethics refer to what is Good, what is Bad, What is Right, What is Wrong.
That's how we and the society saw things as - Either it's right or wrong, it was simple binary for us those days.
Morals were universally accepted within the society we lived in.
We see Moral conflicts everywhere around us, people taking Moral high ground than the other, with differences in definition of what is right and what is Wrong.
Let's begin with the classical Moral conflict - A Vegetarian calling meat eaters immoral. While this eternal conflict keeps going on while both sides defending and using all convenient logic to put the other party irrational, somewhere in the middle came Eggetarians "Excuse me, Egg is scientifically not meat, so morally I am right"
A Vegetarian who vehemently argues and makes meat eaters feel they have sinned by killing a poor animal just to fill the stomach, brazenly goes on a cockroach killing spree, beats the street dogs with stones as he can't stand them! Hypocrisy at its best!
It's all about lust, isn't it.Lust for food, lust for power, lust for sexual desires, lust for money.
This lust towards something that we desire to or just our ego, makes us to come up with our own rationale to say We are right.
A Vendor bribing a company official or a common man bribing a Govt official, pre-marital sex, relation outside marriage, homosexuality - People indulging in any of these will have their own logic to defend what they do is not wrong, if not right.
A road rage, a road accident leads to two parties blaming each other.
Just because a particular sect worships an animal, it will be considered immoral for the entire country to be consuming that animal as food.
A set of People find a Govt ruling hurting their living in their perceived way, they agitate, cause ruckus and cause greater discomfort to a larger population.
Govt has the audacity to believe they have the moral right to bring any rule, as they are the elected Govt.
We better take the Politics away, as the common belief is everyone in Politics have lost shame, morality and ethics. Yet, each political party points fingers at each other.
Few people taking law in their own hands to punish what they believe as Immoral for a man and women to be together before Marriage.
People find Live-in relation, relation outside marriage, homosexuality as Immoral, whereas people engaging in such relations deny a question of Morality, but a freedom of their way of living.
While we all outrightly reject the idea of Terrorism and Naxalism, It's only a term given to them by us, and none involved with such groups would feel they are wrong but only fighting for an idea or a cause.
Men drinking and smoking has slowly over the years is acceptable and is no more a question of Morality, however women doing the same is still considered immoral.
What's the definition of Morality now? Who is the sitting judge to decide what is Right, what is Wrong? Or Who is Right, who is Wrong?
Morality itself has lost its context.
Morality makes sense when People from same culture, region stay in a community, as it is more likely to have similar mindset and realities.
Their upbringing, culture, assumptions, lifestyle becomes part of localized "common sense", hence forms the foundation of Morality.
In the present day world we live in, it is no more a localized environment. People have exposure to other cultures and societies, people travel places and import other cultures. In such a globalised world, the geographical limitations of a society has blurred causing influx of mixed ideas and lifestyle.
This forms a break in a pattern and understanding of Life in general, causing conflicts and differences in the society.
Yet there are examples of the likes of Zaira Wasim, who quit a very promising career in Bollywood as she thought its immoral to be in such a career.
Some might think it's irrational, and the same act is hailed as peak of Morality by others.
It is completely a different scenario with some of the African, European and Middle East countries, where the Morals are still intact. Whether we like it or not, there is a common understanding and realities among the people.
The question remains: who sits in judgement, if everyone have varied realities, their own definition of Morals and Ethics? Where will such conflicts lead us to, if there is no common ground of basic living principles?
Even if our perceived Morals is against other's beliefs, can We say Sorry to each other to bridge the gap?
The word Sorry is probably worth writing a new article all together.
How many of us genuinely say Sorry? Our Ego stops us doing so, as our perceived Morals makes us strongly believe we are never wrong and there is no need for a Sorry.
The Sorry might not be for the act or for what we said, it could just be for hurting other person's beliefs.
My wife says Sorry to me so many times, and most of the times it is embarrassing to receive a Sorry. She says sorry at the drop of the hat, to ensure I am not hurt with her views.
Ofcourse, she ensures I also say Sorry. Her approach is simple and effective "I will say Sorry, you also say Sorry. This will nullify the conflict or clash
Can we adopt such a simple method to keep the society healthy in large!